🔍 Who Is Langdon Miller? An In-Depth Look

by

The Swedish Club’s Board President and the Legal Record That Follows

Langdon Miller is a man of distinction. A Stanford-trained oncologist. A biotech executive who helped launch SolveTx with $126 million in financing. A longtime Swedish Club member.

And for over the last two years, he has also been President of the Swedish Club’s Board of Directors—during what may be the most turbulent and opaque period in the organization’s history.

Why We Created the Miller Dossier

As part of my effort to bring the truth to light in Campbell v. Swedish Club, I have compiled a detailed evidentiary packet for the court case:

“To provide the Court with a synthesized evidentiary analysis of Langdon Miller’s role and conduct as a fiduciary leader of the Swedish Club.”
—Declaration of Elizabeth A. Campbell, May 2025

That packet—what we now call the Miller Dossier—draws on court filings, discovery responses, and public records to show exactly how a man with every qualification to lead instead has become the face of avoidance, collapse, and legal defiance.

📌 What the Dossier Reveals

💼 Financial Power, No Oversight

Despite his stature in finance and medicine, Miller presided over:

  • A 16-month period with no board-approved financials
  • A revolving door of six treasurers in three years
  • Bylaw irregularities and board appointments with no transparency

🧾 Discovery Obstruction

In response to direct questions about:

  • Who ordered Plaintiff’s termination and exclusion from the Swedish Club?
  • What role Kristine Leander played in member abuse and employee discrimination?
  • What role did Miller play in the Swedish Club’s social devolution and financial disarray?
  • Where are the Club’s business, financial, employment, and member records stored?

Miller replied with blanket objections. No answers. No accountability.

📁 Document Control Contradictions

While defense attorneys on Miller’s behalf claimed in their court filings that he had “no custody or control” of Club records, earlier emails showed that documents were stored on Club servers—and acknowledged as such by counsel. Yet to this day, those records have not been produced.

🧷 What This Means

The Swedish Club is a nonprofit under Washington law. Its board members—especially the President—have legal duties of care, loyalty, and good faith under RCW 24.03A.495.

What this case reveals is not just miscommunication or procedural error. It suggests a bad faith, a pattern of exclusion, retaliation, and obfuscation, at the highest level of governance.

📄 Want to See the Full Document?

We know 104 pages is a lot. But for those who want to read the full Miller Dossier, including the exhibits submitted to the Court, it is available here:

👉 Read the entire Miller Dossier Exhibit (104 pages) (PDF)

👉 Read the standalone Miller Dossier (PDF)

👉 Read the Elizabeth Campbell’s Miller Declaration (PDF)

👉 Read the Miller Dossier Exhibits:

  • Exhibit A features key excerpts from the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. #180), filed on April 21, 2025. These pages highlight Langdon Miller’s financial background, board authority, and the disconnect between his professional expertise and the Swedish Club’s internal collapse. The excerpts support allegations of fiduciary breach and contextualize his central role in the litigation.
  • Exhibit B Miller’s responses to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and requests for production. The exhibit documents Miller’s near-total refusal to answer, invoking broad objections to basic questions about board decisions, executive oversight, and Plaintiff’s exclusion—despite his position as Board President. These responses are central to Plaintiff’s motion to compel and allegations of noncompliance with discovery obligations.
  • Exhibit C Table presents a detailed table mapping the Swedish Club’s blanket objections and boilerplate responses across 35 requests for production. It highlights the Club’s refusal to acknowledge custody of core governance documents, despite prior representations that they were stored on Club servers. The table demonstrates a systemic pattern of evasion and supports claims of discovery obstruction and potential spoliation.
  • Exhibit D is the publicly filed complaint in the now-dismissed receivership action brought by Plaintiff against the Swedish Club. While no longer pending, the pleading outlines systemic governance failures—including treasurer turnover, lack of financial controls, and board disengagement—during Miller’s leadership. It reinforces the narrative of fiduciary dysfunction underlying the current case.

✉️ Final Thought

This isn’t about one man. It’s about how institutions fail when even the most capable leaders turn away from their responsibilities. As members, employees, or even as concerned citizens or the visiting public, we have a right—and a duty—to demand better and accountability.

Stay tuned. More is coming.

Leave a Comment